@InProceedings{OliveiraSantMedeFerr:2017:AvAcPo,
author = "Oliveira, Livia Minette Minette de and Santos, Afonso de Paula dos
and Medeiros, Nilcilene das Gra{\c{c}}as and Ferraz, Ant{\^o}nio
Santana",
title = "Avalia{\c{c}}{\~a}o da acur{\'a}cia posicional das imagens do
sat{\'e}lite CBERS-4 sensor MUX",
booktitle = "Anais...",
year = "2017",
editor = "Gherardi, Douglas Francisco Marcolino and Arag{\~a}o, Luiz
Eduardo Oliveira e Cruz de",
pages = "1643--1651",
organization = "Simp{\'o}sio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto, 18. (SBSR)",
publisher = "Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)",
address = "S{\~a}o Jos{\'e} dos Campos",
abstract = "Orbital images have been widely used nowadays, and they have been
aided the process of cartographic updating. CBERS-4 is a satellite
that was developed, in partnership, between Brazilian and Chinese
government. Since it is a recent satellite, there are a few
studies about the images positional quality, and the products
created of them. Therefore, this research objective was analyze
the positional accuracy of two CBERS-4 sensor MUX images. One of
the images was obtained by the Chinese images processing center,
and the other image was obtained by the Brazilian images
processing center. Located at the city of Vi{\c{c}}osa-MG, the
study area was S\āo Bartolomeu basin zone. ArcGIS software
was used to collect and manipulate homologous points, through
orbital images acquired of CBERS-4 satellite, and Ikonos satellite
orthorectified image, 1:10,000 scale, as reference. These points,
posteriorly, were analyzed and classified by GEOPEC software,
which uses the positional accuracy of Brazilian standard. Law
number 89,817 defines this standard. CBERS-4 available image,
processed in China, got classification B for 1:1,000,000 scale,
and it was classified as tendentious. But, it got classification A
after being translated, for a 1:100,000 scale, and it was
classified as non-tendentious. The tendency test which uses
circular directional average, and circular variance was used to
define if the images were tendentious. CBERS-4 available image,
processed in Brazil, got classification A for 1:50,000 scales, and
it was classified as tendentious. It got classification A even
after being translated, for a 1:50,000 scales, and it was
classified as non-tendentious.",
conference-location = "Santos",
conference-year = "28-31 maio 2017",
isbn = "978-85-17-00088-1",
label = "59241",
language = "pt",
organisation = "Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)",
ibi = "8JMKD3MGP6W34M/3PSLP3M",
url = "http://urlib.net/ibi/8JMKD3MGP6W34M/3PSLP3M",
targetfile = "59241.pdf",
type = "Cartografia e fotogrametria",
urlaccessdate = "27 abr. 2024"
}